Friday, September 6, 2019

The Left Talks of Tolerance, but They Seldom Give One.




The Left Talks of Tolerance, but They Seldom Give One.



Arabian Nights? Entertainment. The Left Talks of Tolerance, but They Seldom Give One. 
About 17 years ago, I met a teacher who was a homosexual. It was something that was strange to me because I had never heard of it until the students explained it to me. I used to visit him in his classroom to chat with him and understand his mindset. I told him that it was an abomination to live like that. He called me names as usual. We laughed. He invited me with other teachers to his home for parties, and we attended. 

After some time, I could not see him in school. I asked from other teachers who told me that he was suspended because a student accused him of choking him. I told them that the guy was too nice, and he will not choke that kid. I quickly picked up the phone and called him. He told me that he has been prohibited from talking to any teacher in school, so I should talk to his lawyer. I told his lawyer that I wanted to be his witness. 

The following day, I went to school and tried to campaign for other teachers to join me and testify on his behalf. The same people who talked about tolerance were too afraid to join me because the principal wanted him gone. He told them that anyone who will testify on his behalf will be gone. I said to myself, "This guy is not a bad person, and he is not a bad teacher, eventhough he is gay. Shouldn't he be judged for his teaching skills rather than his sexual orientation?" It is important to remember that all the other teachers with whom he ate and drank, and who were accusing me of being homophobic and intolerant were too scared to stand for the truth. They too wanted him gone. They laughed with him publicly, but they hated him in private.

On the day of his trial, I went there. The lawyer called me to the stand. 
I began by saying that, I am a Christian, and this man is a honmosexual. There is no reason why I should stand for him, since I don't condone the lifestyle. I should be happy, but it will be destroying an innocent man. He is a very gentle and nice person. He could and would not do what he is accused of. As such, I want them to find him not guilty. They asked me if I was done. I said yes. They asked me to leave. 

His lawyer told me that the trial ended right there after I left. They said that it is a great testimony for your “enemy” to testify for you. That is his life. If he wants to destroy it, I can only make suggestions, but I am not the judge to pass judgments.

The principal decided to give my job away with the pretext that I resigned. I asked them to show the resignation letter, but there was none. They later said that my certificate had expired; meanwhile, it did not. I would only know the real reason the principal gave away my position two years after I met one of the administrators who had become a principal herself somewhere else. 

People talk about tolerance, but they cannot pay the price. They are unwilling to extend the same largess to others who think differently from them. I know very well that a gay person would never have stood for me. That is the truth! They are so intolerant and hateful! If you disagree with them, they want you to lose your job. They call your jobsite and threaten to sue them. They purposely destroy businesses that disagree with them. These are the very people who talk of tolerance. Wherein then is the tolerance? I hope we can differ in opinions but still rise above our differences and love one another. 

Until then, tolerance is the weapon of the strong communicators, and intolerance is that of the weak and insecure communicator. 

St Arrey of Ntenako.  


“Bonyfish beware because the same net that caught the jawless fish, caught the cartilaginous fish” (Hamilton Ayuk). Beware earthly paradise seekers because there is a serpent in every paradise"(Hamilton Ayuk). "If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable." (I Cor 15:19). "It is not how well you know a person; it is how well you treat them that they will live longer and happier with you." Hamilton Ayuk. Idle people write, idler people read, and idlest people read and whine that idle people are taking their time (Hamilton Ayuk).

Saturday, June 29, 2019

Does "no" always mean no?


Does "no" always mean no?
That is incorrect! No is not always a no. At times, "no": is negotiable, other times it is uncertainty and in most cases, it is really means no, depending on the grammatical arrangement. For example, no followed by exclamation sign and no followed by an interrogation sign don't have the same meaning.

There will be three meanings of no: No, (low fall) no (high rise)! and no (high fall)? All will mean different things. Your next question will be how do I know which one they want. Their meanings will be determined by the intonation of the speaker. That is why the women who talk about a "soft no" are correct. I have followed several cases where it was said that the :no" was not emphatic, which is correct and true.

Now let us go through the meanings.
If I said "No" followed by an exclamation sign no!,  that is emphatic. That is a prayer, request or an order.
If I said : no" followed by an interrogation sign  no?, that is seeking consent. That is undergoing negotiation.
If I said no followed by a comma, that is uncertainty.
The same thing goes for yes. There are cases where a yes could actually mean no. Let your "no" be very clear and emphatic with no codes that is leaves no inferential window.
Until then, be emphatic with your no.
St Arrey of Ntenako

“Bonyfish beware because the same net that caught the jawless fish, caught the cartilaginous fish” (Hamilton Ayuk). Beware earthly paradise seekers because there is a serpent in every paradise"(Hamilton Ayuk). "If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable." (I Cor 15:19). "It is not how well you know a person; it is how well you treat them that they will live longer and happier with you." Hamilton Ayuk. Idle people write, idler people read, and idlest people read and whine that idle people are taking their time (Hamilton Ayuk).

Friday, December 21, 2018

Was Jesus born on December 25th (Christmas Day)?

Was Jesus born on December 25th?

During Christmas, there is always that big debate about the exact date of Jesus. There are so many camps that you don’t even know which one to belong. Some believe He was born on December 25th, but others believe he was not. Others don’t even believe that he existed; therefore, they negate his human birth at all. God has revealed his greatness even more in that while we were sinners, he gave his son Jesus to die for us. Hold on a minute, we were on earth, and he must be born for mankind. So, an angel appeared to a virgin, called Mary to tell her she will conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost and will deliver a child whose name will be called Jesus. Jesus was born in a manger wrapped in swaddles. After his birth, three magi visited him to pay homage as the King of kings and Lord of lords. Since his birth, a day has been generally celebrated to commemorate his coming for the soul of humanity.

Behold the enigma! Was Jesus born on December 25th?

There is no such mention in the Bible. However, the argument for and against Christmas is childish. Why take all that pain to prove that Jesus was or was not born on December 25th? There must always be a horizontal interpretation of the Bible to establish proper hermeneutics. People have said that the 25th of December was a day that the pagans worshiped the sun god. That is a bad interpretation. It is like arguing that because the USA celebrates 4th of July as Independence Day, but the Philippines celebrates it as Republic Day, then the Americans are celebrating the Filipinos's Republic Day, or the Filipinos are celebrating the American Independence Day. Now, it would be stupid for someone to get up one day and say, " Did you know that the Americans celebrate 4th of July as Independence Day, but the Filipinos celebrate it as the Republic Day? Would it then be right to accuse the Filipino of celebrating the American Holiday? You must look across the board to see how that day is celebrated.  The pagans celebrated December 25 as a day for the sun god, but the Jews also celebrated it as a day to offer gifts to the poor, way before the advent of Jesus (Esther 9:22). It was called there Feast of Purim. 

There has never been a solved debate on the validity of the 25th of December as the day Christ was born. However, everyone is certain the date foreshadows hope and foretells a bright future for those who will trust in Him. On the day He was born (December 25th or whatever day) began the beginning of redemption and the paroxysm was his death. Christ died that humanity may have rest and hope. Many have joined in this celebration and a few more resist and reject the feast. They argue that they are not Christians. 

Some people consider the day as the most important and others do not. While there is no injunction against holidays, there are guidelines to manage days of feasting in our lives as God must be the center of them (Rom 14:5-9). In whatever we do, we are to do it for the glory of God (I Cor 10:31). For some, December 25th is important, but to others, it is not. Christian maturity then comes in with the application of Romans 14:5-6.

During Christmas, we have traditionalized the habit of giving gifts and perfunctory Christmas wishes. I mean wishes that mean really nothing. Even in the course of giving, the ethos thereof is defeated because the gifts nowadays have two classes: the poor man’s gift and the rich man’s gift. Gifts actually were for the poor and not for the rich. When the Jews had rested from all their enemies and their sorrow was turned to joy; from mourning into a good day, they decided to feast and enjoy, sending portions to one another and gifts to the poor (Esther 9:22). Wasn't that true delectation and true lebensfreude?

 Whether they believe in him or not or trust the date or not one question abounds: Does Christmas really bring hope to you?

Until then, remember the advice of Paul o to the Romans 14:5-6.

St Arrey of Ntenako.


“Bonyfish beware because the same net that caught the jawless fish, caught the cartilaginous fish” (Hamilton Ayuk). Beware earthly paradise seekers because there is a serpent in every paradise"(Hamilton Ayuk). "If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable." (I Cor 15:19). "It is not how well you know a person; it is how well you treat them that they will live longer and happier with you." Hamilton Ayuk. Idle people write, idler people read, and idlest people read and whine that idle people are taking their time (Hamilton Ayuk).

Sunday, September 2, 2018

Reminder for a will if you have assets or mind where you are buried.


If you love your family and don’t want them going front and back the courts, then you must write your will while you live. The living will not take verbal declarations to heart. They will try to put asunder what God has joined together. As you know; profit making and not brotherliness is the heartbeat of the current society. People will make a deal out of nothing, if they have monetary interest at stake. Those involved with zombies will want you to leave your body, so they could come back and repossess it. Remember that we will be controlled by two extremes; the far right and the far left because it is a new philosophy. Though the moderates have to bear the brunt of their extremism. One should be open to both camps, if they want to be wise and be foolish too. Both have a bit of foolishness and a bit of wisdom. We need both in life.

In the absence of a written will, we have to rely on the utmost good faith of the living partner to execute the wish of the defunct. Marriage being a family affair and not a reclusive turncoat, you will have to share your will with family members to avoid any foul play in case your will did not match that of your living partner. A good decision can only be made with a sound mind. So, you shouldn’t postpone writing your will. The decisions we make as we live will influence our entire life. If you don’t make wise decisions, the living will make them for you when you die. David says, “teach us to number our days, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom” (Ps 90:12). It is better to go to the house of mourning, than to go to the house of feasting: for that is the end of all men; and the living will lay it to his heart (Eccl 7:2).

If one of the partners dies without living a will, the living partner has the right under biblical considerations to do with the body as he or she pleases because “therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh (Gen 2:24). When a woman leaves her parents, she gets married to her husband and not her parents, the state or church. That means, in the absence of a written will, the husband decides how to keep the body of the wife and no one else. The church intervening in such matters, is destroying the very fabric of the institution of marriage whereby “The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise, also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife” (I Cor 7:4).

Finally, when the light is out, the beacon of the dead stalls and shines according to their works. Consequently, the bitter memories will live for some time between the family of the dead and that of the living partner. Such calamites sometimes put the country one more time in the lime light, raising serious questions about the laws of the land.
Until then, you shouldn’t postpone writing your will for you can die any time, any day.

St Arrey of Ntenako. 

“Bonyfish beware because the same net that caught the jawless fish, caught the cartilaginous fish” (Hamilton Ayuk). Beware earthly paradise seekers because there is a serpent in every paradise"(Hamilton Ayuk). "If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable." (I Cor 15:19). "It is not how well you know a person; it is how well you treat them that they will live longer and happier with you." Hamilton Ayuk. Idle people write, idler people read, and idlest people read and whine that idle people are taking their time (Hamilton Ayuk).

Friday, June 29, 2018

Is it Biblical for Christians to do In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)?

A Christian sister used In Vitro Fertilization to bear her first child because she was nearing menopause without a child. The church disciplined her because it is sinful. If God did not have problems with surrogacy, I wonder why he would pose problems of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF). Juxtaposing the definition of IVF and the practice of adultery and fornication, it is clear that the woman has not committed any of those sins by doing IVF because “IVF is the process of fertilization by extracting eggs, retrieving a sperm sample, and then manually combining an egg and sperm in a laboratory dish. The embryo(s) is then transferred to the uterus.”[1] IVF then becomes like having an organ transplant. Does God refuse organ transplant? Does God refuse or prohibit recovery? Some people say that it is adultery or fornication. Perhaps we should define both “adultery” and “fornication”.
Biblically, the word adultery in the Old Testament (Ex 20:14; Deut. 5:18; Prov. 6:32; Jer 3:8) comes from the Hebrew word “nawaf”, meaning to break the wedlock. Wedlock is defined as, “The state of being married.” In the New Testament (Mt 5:27; 19:19), it uses the word "moicheuō" which transcended to unlawful sexual relationship out of marriage with another person. You will agree with me that boyfriends and girlfriends and concubinage are not that state of wedlock. Wedlock only deals with married couples. Therefore, adultery only occurs when one party or both parties who are married have sex out of married with another married or single person without the consent of their partner. Does the above mention resemble surrogacy or IVF? Let us jump now to fornication.
In the Old Testament, the word fornication transliterated as /zänä/ meant illicit sex. That included prostitution, adultery, playing the harlot and unfaithfulness to God in its figurative sense. In the New Testament (NT), it was the term indirectly applied to illicit sex (Mt 5:32; Jn 8:41; Acts 15:20, Rom 1:29.). In the NT again, it was closely related only to incest and adultery (I Cor 5:1). Paul clarifies the picture of fornication in I Cor 10:8 by alluding to the Baalpeor Incident (Num 25:1-9); an incident in which Israelite men slept indiscriminately with Moabite women. Thus fornication is the sum total of illicit sex. Nevertheless, in its closed context, it will seem to mean sex between two unmarried people.
The first passage that deals with premarital sex or fornication directly is Exodus 22:16-17. The passage alleges that; if a man entices a woman who was not taken by another man he should marry her. Thus it does not condemn it as a sin but regards it as a prelude to marriage. This may infer that sex should lead to marriage or be in marriage. Sex should not be for sex sake. If the father of the girl refused them from getting married then the man should pay some dowry. It was the same condition for rape. If a man raped a woman he was to marry her (Deut 22:28-29). That rather condemns premarital sex when used without consent and not premarital sex per se. If a woman who was to be married to another man was raped, the man was recommended for death penalty (Deut 22:25-28). How is this like IVF?
Yesteryears, it was not by in vitro; it was really by the surrogate spreading it to the husband, so she can bear them a child. That at times was a risky venture that ended with the surrogate becoming the Mrs. Would collecting the man’s seeds (if he has any at all) and then inject the surrogate or the future mother better?
Sarah gave Abram, Hagar to father a child (Gen 16:2). How could this be bad, yet God inducted Abraham into the Hall of Faith (Heb 11:8)? In Genesis 30:1-6, Rachel gave her servant to Jacob so that she will conceive for her a child. Jacob too was inducted into the Hall of Faith.
In Deut 21:13, the Bible gives an intrinsic presentation when it encourages the Israeli male to bring a female captive home, sleep with her and then make her his wife. If he does not like her, then he sends her back to her parents. The passage is unambiguous considering the custom. Bringing the woman to live with him was already a fulfillment of marriage; thus, sex could take place. The marriage that was to follow was the ceremony. Nowadays that may lead us to common law marriages and cohabitation.
It is also important to remember that anything that the Bible does not condemn explicitly, God has left it for the mere mortals themselves to make the judgment. It is at this juncture that you must correlate you syneidesis with you synderesis.



Until then, there is nothing wrong with In Vitro Fertilization.



[1] In Vitro Fertilization (IVF): Side Effects and Risks. (2017, July 28). Retrieved from http://americanpregnancy.org/infertility/in-vitro-fertilization/


“Bonyfish beware because the same net that caught the jawless fish, caught the cartilaginous fish” (Hamilton Ayuk). Beware earthly paradise seekers because there is a serpent in every paradise"(Hamilton Ayuk). "If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable." (I Cor 15:19). "It is not how well you know a person; it is how well you treat them that they will live longer and happier with you." Hamilton Ayuk. Idle people write, idler people read, and idlest people read and whine that idle people are taking their time (Hamilton Ayuk).

Saturday, April 21, 2018

Can a partner commit adultery against his girlfriend or boyfriend?



“My boyfriend is cheating on me. Isn’t he committing adultery?”

In this age of “every participant gets a trophy,” I am afraid that I will have to burst your bubble and hurt your feelings. Adultery is not a play of words. Your position is syllogically illogical, hermeneutically inaccurate and biblically unfounded.
Biblically, the word adultery in the Old Testament (Ex 20:14; Deut. 5:18; Prov. 6:32; Jer 3:8) comes from the Hebrew word “nawaf”, meaning to break the wedlock. Wedlock is defined as, “The state of being married.” In the New Testament (Mt 5:27; 19:19), it uses the word "moicheuō" which transcended to unlawful sexual relationship out of marriage with another person. You will agree with me that boyfriends and girlfriends and concubinage are not that state of wedlock. Wedlock only deals with married couples.
In other words, since you and your boyfriend are not married, he cannot commit adultery by sleeping with another single woman. He can only commit adultery if the woman or women he is having sex with is or are legally married to someone else. To be considered married, amongst other things, you also need to have a marriage license and a declaration in front of a state witness to make your marriage public. You cannot just consider yourself married simply because you date someone or you have been living together with someone. In short, you cannot just classify any act of cheating as adultery.
Therefore, adultery only occurs when one party or both parties who are married have sex out of married with another married or single person without the consent of their partner. It also means that, even though a person is married, he or she will not be committing adultery if their husband or common law spouse  gives them the permission to have sex out of marriage. Sarah did that to Abraham. She gave him permission to have sex with Hagar (Gen 16:2). We never heard anywhere in the Bible that God rebuked him for that. Instead, he was counted as a righteous man. Rachel gave Bilhah to Jacob so she could conceive a child for them(Gen 30:3-4). 
You could claim adultery if you live in a common law jurisdiction where concubinage is considered marriage. Concubinage can only be considered married if you carry yourself in the public eye and at home as married couples and not by longevity of living or staying together.  
Syllogically, common sense will tell you that if someone is not married to another person, although they may claim cheating, they may not claim adultery since adultery has to do with breaking the wedlock.
Hermeneutically, the historicity of  the Jews unfolds that adultery was only when a married woman had sex out of marriage; whereas, the man had to have sex with someone’s wife for him to be accused of adultery (Gen 16:1-4; 30:1-5; 38: 15-18). That is why you see in the bible whenever a woman was caught in adultery, she was accused of adultery and not the man, if she was married (Jn 8:1-11). However, Jesus righted the inequality when he placed adultery as illicit sex out of marriage for everyone: male or female (Mt 5:32; 19:9).
Consequently, your case is dismissed with total prejudice. 

Until then, your boyfriend has cheated on you, but he has not committed adultery.


St. Arrey of Ntenako
“Bonyfish beware because the same net that caught the jawless fish, caught the cartilaginous fish” (Hamilton Ayuk). Beware earthly paradise seekers because there is a serpent in every paradise"(Hamilton Ayuk). "If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable." (I Cor 15:19). "It is not how well you know a person; it is how well you treat them that they will live longer and happier with you." Hamilton Ayuk. Idle people write, idler people read, and idlest people read and whine that idle people are taking their time (Hamilton Ayuk).

Sunday, April 1, 2018

Pastor Suleiman's False prophecy about the War in Cameroon





It is my opinion that this prophecy by pastor Suleiman is fake, and I will give you a few reasons. Suleiman said, “If I tell everything that I saw, they wouldn’t let me back in again, so I will filter.” Did you ever see a man of God in the Bible who was afraid to tell mere mortals what God had commissioned him to tell them?  He is afraid of man more than he is afraid of God. God gives him a message to tell the people, but he says that he will not give it to them because he does not want the authorities to pursue him.
Suleiman said, “If you love me, you allow me, filter.” I will repeat Paul’s words to him, “ If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable(I Cor 15:19)”. He persisted, "It is not anglophone /francophone. It is demonic to suck blood." No doubt there are principalities and powers, but this is typical of the early prophecies of born twice and raised from the dead where people were dying and seeing demons drinking blood. That is the imagination of the African mind due to our culture. We always believe in witches drinking and sucking blood from us. In a war, there will be blood spilled. He saw provinces.
Suleiman continues with his prophecy, and this time he uses a technique common to preachers. Cameroon is divided in provinces and not states. Does the Lord need to show anyone in a special revelation that Cameroon is divided in provinces?
Suleiman reported, “Papa God showed me ten. Is it ten?” This God has to show Suleiman ten provinces of Cameroon. Very few Cameroonians will not be able to tell you how many states are in Nigeria because we learn that in school. The same goes with Nigerians because they do the history of their neighbors. There are very few people in Cameroon who attended secondary school, talk less of high school and university who do not even know how different countries are made up of.
Suleiman must have Cameroonian friends, and those friends must have at least spoken to him about the provinces. That again shows the dubious nature of this prophecy. There are very few people in Cameroon who attended secondary school, talk less of high school and university who do not even know how different countries are made up, talk less of how many provinces are in Cameroon.
Pastor Suleiman continues, “What God showed me is ten. I saw ten. Is it ten? I saw ten.” Why would God give something this banal as a special revelation?  That is because the predators like the TV evangelists constantly employ the shotgun technique. It is a technique where the predator asks generalized set of questions with the hope that someone will feel touched just as bullets from a shotgun into a pack of monkeys will catch one. “Is it ten? I saw ten. Is it ten?” The people start to jump up that God has showed the man of God that Cameroon has ten provinces.
In a current dispensation where many suffer from the Itchy Ear Syndrome, it is normal to see false and fake ministers employ this technique with greater success. Suleiman pretends as if it is a revelation to solicit the participation of the sheeple. Lo and behold, they are so carried that they start to jump up and down for the great revelation that the Lord has given. That is false prophecy.
He says that God told him that the church in the ten provinces, sorry regions should pray consecutively for 21 days. He said that they should pray for the strong man and not for peace for war to end. Wars and rumors of wars are a sign that Jesus is coming soon. It is not a secret that there will be wars.
He says that in this war, some people are making money. Look, it is common sense that in every war, there are people who are making money. That is why those who sell arms and render other types of services make money, and they are always the instigators of war who do not even want it to end.
To show you how fake Sulieman is, he said that the people should not pray for peace, yet at the end of his sermon in his prayer, he was praying for peace. I feel bad for this people. You see, when a people have suffered for too long, they will drink fairytales on fairylands with insatiable gullibility.

Until then, this prophecy is fake and should not be respected.

St Arrey of Ntenako



“Bonyfish beware because the same net that caught the jawless fish, caught the cartilaginous fish” (Hamilton Ayuk). Beware earthly paradise seekers because there is a serpent in every paradise"(Hamilton Ayuk). "If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable." (I Cor 15:19). "It is not how well you know a person; it is how well you treat them that they will live longer and happier with you." Hamilton Ayuk. Idle people write, idler people read, and idlest people read and whine that idle people are taking their time (Hamilton Ayuk).

The Left Talks of Tolerance, but They Seldom Give One.

The Left Talks of Tolerance, but They Seldom Give One. Arabian Nights? Entertainment. The Left Talks of Tolerance, but They ...